The BASEL Accords are a set of international banking regulations created by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). Their primary goal is to ensure the stability and soundness of the global banking system by specifying robust capital requirements and adopting effective risk management practices.
Historical Context
Basel I
The first Basel Accord, commonly known as Basel I, was introduced in 1988. Basel I focused on credit risk and established a minimum capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of 8% of risk-weighted assets (RWA). This was a significant step towards unifying international banking standards.
Basel II
Basel II, introduced in 2004, expanded upon its predecessor by incorporating three pillars:
- Minimum Capital Requirements: Refining the rules for calculating RWAs.
- Supervisory Review: Providing guidelines for regulatory review and intervention.
- Market Discipline: Encouraging transparency through disclosure requirements.
Basel III
Following the 2008 financial crisis, Basel III was established to address weaknesses in the previous accords. Basel III, introduced between 2010 and 2011, focused on:
- Higher Capital Requirements: Increasing the quality and quantity of capital banks must hold.
- Leverage Ratio: Implementing a non-risk-based leverage ratio.
- Liquidity Requirements: Introducing liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and net stable funding ratio (NSFR) to ensure banks can withstand short- and long-term financial stresses.
Key Components
Capital Adequacy
The primary concern of the Basel Accords is to ensure banks maintain a certain level of capital relative to their RWAs. This is to absorb potential losses and lower the risk of insolvency.
Risk Assessment
Banks are required to implement rigorous internal measures for assessing risk, which include:
- Credit Risk: The risk of default by borrowers.
- Market Risk: The risk of losses due to market fluctuations.
- Operational Risk: The risk from internal failures or external events.
Supervisory Review
National regulators review banks’ internal assessments and regulatory reports to ensure compliance and enforce actions if a bank’s capital falls below the required threshold.
Market Discipline
Transparency is encouraged by requiring banks to disclose their capital structure, risk exposure, and risk assessment processes. This helps stakeholders make informed decisions.
Impact and Criticisms
Benefits
- Stability: Enhances global financial stability.
- Transparency: Increases market discipline through improved disclosure.
- Uniformity: Harmonizes banking regulations internationally.
Criticisms
- Complexity: Particularly with Basel II and III, critics argue the frameworks are overly complex.
- Capital Requirements: Higher capital requirements may restrict banks’ capacity to lend, impacting economic growth.
- Implementation: Disparities in the implementation across different jurisdictions can create an uneven playing field.
FAQs
What is the main purpose of the BASEL Accords?
How do Basel I, Basel II, and Basel III differ?
How are the Basel Accords implemented internationally?
References
- Bank for International Settlements (BIS) - Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
- Elliot, D. J., “Basel III, the Banks, and the Economy,” Brookings Institution, 2010.
- “Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms,” Bank for International Settlements, 2017.
- “The Basel Accords: A Beginner’s Guide,” Investopedia.
Summary
The Basel Accords represent a crucial element in the ongoing effort to enhance international banking stability through stringent capital requirements, comprehensive risk assessments, supervisory reviews, and market discipline standards. Despite criticisms regarding their complexity and impact on lending, they remain pivotal in maintaining the resilience of the global banking system.
See also:
