Judgment Sample: Auditor's Determination Based on Experience

August 25, 2024 4 min read Accounting Auditing Judgment Sample Auditing Techniques Sampling Method Auditor's Experience Accounting Practices

A judgment sample in auditing involves the determination by an auditor, based on personal experience and familiarity with the client, of the number and particular items to be examined in a population, ensuring objectivity and thoroughness in testing the sampled items for accuracy.

On this page

A judgment sample in auditing refers to a sampling method where an auditor uses their personal experience and professional judgment to select the number and the specific items to examine within a population. This method is grounded in the auditor’s familiarity with the client and aims to ensure the objectivity and thoroughness of the audit.

How Judgment Sampling Works

Auditor’s Experience and Familiarity

Auditors leverage their experience and understanding of a client’s business operations to make informed decisions about the sample. This subjective selection process factors in:

Risk Assessment: Identifying high-risk areas within the financial statements.
Materiality: Knowing what items are significant to the overall financial health of the organization.
Previous Audit Results: Considering findings and anomalies from prior audits.
Industry Knowledge: Understanding typical issues within the industry the client operates in.

Sample Size and Selection

The auditor determines:

Number of Items to Examine: Based on the complexity and size of the population.
Specific Items to Audit: Choosing items that are likely to provide insightful results about the population’s characteristics or areas considered high-risk.

Why Use Judgment Sampling?

Advantages

Efficiency: Allows auditors to focus on areas most likely to contain errors or fraud.
Expert Insight: Utilizes the auditor’s experience and expertise, adding a layer of professional skepticism.
Flexibility: Adapts to the specifics of the client’s operations and business environment.

Disadvantages

Risk of Bias: Since the selection is subjective, there is a potential for auditor bias.
Non-replicability: Different auditors may choose different items, leading to variations in audit findings.
Overlooked Areas: Critical items may be inadvertently omitted from the sample.

Examples

Consider an auditor tasked with auditing a large retailer. Instead of randomly sampling transactions, the auditor may decide to:

Focus on high-value transactions.
Audit transactions occurring at year-end.
Examine transactions related to a specific supplier known for past discrepancies.

Historical Context

Judgment sampling has been a longstanding practice in the field of auditing. While modern auditing standards emphasize the use of statistical sampling techniques to minimize bias and improve reliability, judgment sampling remains a crucial tool, particularly for its effectiveness in identifying areas of concern quickly.

Applicability

When to Use

Judgment sampling is particularly useful:

In initial risk assessments.
When dealing with small populations where statistical sampling may not be practical.
For areas requiring deep, expert analysis rather than broad overview.

Comparisons to Statistical Sampling

Statistical Sampling: Quantitative, relies on random selection and probability theory to make generalizable conclusions about the population.
Judgment Sampling: Qualitative, relies on the auditor’s expertise and is tailored to specific audit needs, though less generalizable.

Sampling Risk: The risk that the auditor’s conclusion based on a sample may differ from the conclusion if the entire population were tested.
Materiality: A threshold set by auditors to determine the significance of an item or error in the financial statements.
Professional Skepticism: A mindset auditors maintain to critically assess evidence and remain alert to conditions that may indicate possible fraud or misstatement.

FAQs

Q: Is judgment sampling as reliable as statistical sampling?

A: While judgment sampling leverages the auditor’s expertise, it is subject to bias and lack of replicability, which can make it less reliable than statistical sampling in some cases.

Q: Can auditors use both judgment and statistical sampling?

A: Yes, auditors often use a combination to balance the thoroughness of judgment sampling with the objectivity and precision of statistical sampling.

Q: How do auditors minimize bias in judgment sampling?

A: By adhering to established auditing standards, undergoing peer reviews, and maintaining documentation of audit procedures and rationale for sample selection.

References

International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). “International Standards on Auditing (ISAs).”
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). “Audit Sampling Guide.”
“Auditing and Assurance Services” by Alvin A. Arens, Randal J. Elder, and Mark S. Beasley.

Summary

Judgment sampling remains an integral part of auditing practice due to its efficiency and the nuanced insights it provides. By relying on the auditor’s professional judgment, experience, and knowledge of the client, auditors can target specific areas of concern and achieve thoroughness and objectivity in their audits.

This carefully structured approach ensures that the entry is detailed, comprehensive, and useful for readers seeking an in-depth understanding of judgment sampling in auditing.