Price fixing is the practice of setting the price of a product or service rather than allowing it to be determined organically by the free market’s forces of supply and demand. This includes agreements between competitors to maintain prices at a certain level, which can distort normal market conditions and reduce competition.
Various Forms of Price Fixing
Horizontal Price Fixing
Horizontal price fixing occurs when competitors within the same industry agree to fix prices. This can include agreements to set minimum or maximum prices or to adhere to a set pricing formula. Horizontal price fixing is often illegal and subject to antitrust laws.
Vertical Price Fixing
Vertical price fixing happens when parties at different levels of the supply chain (such as manufacturers and retailers) agree on the prices at which goods are sold. This can involve resale price maintenance where manufacturers dictate the minimum resale price to retailers.
Notable Examples of Price Fixing
-
The Lysine Price-Fixing Conspiracy: In the early 1990s, major global producers of lysine, an essential amino acid, colluded to fix prices. The conspiracy was uncovered by the FBI, resulting in heavy fines and jail sentences for corporate executives.
-
Airline Ticket Price Fixing: Several airlines have been found guilty of fixing prices for routes, leading to especially high prices on certain domestic and international flights.
-
LIBOR Scandal: The London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) is a benchmark interest rate used globally. Several large financial institutions were found guilty of manipulating LIBOR submissions for their benefit, leading to massive fines and overhauls of the rate-setting process.
Legal Implications of Price Fixing
Price fixing is typically illegal in most jurisdictions due to its adverse effects on free competition and the consumer welfare.
Anti-Trust Laws
In the United States, price fixing is prohibited under the Sherman Antitrust Act. Violations can lead to severe penalties, including fines, injunctions, and imprisonment for individuals involved.
European Union Competition Law
In the European Union, price fixing is addressed under Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). These articles prohibit agreements and practices that may affect trade between member states and prevent, restrict, or distort competition.
Impacts and Considerations
Consumer Harm
Price fixing typically leads to higher prices for consumers, fostering an environment where companies do not compete on price, quality, or innovation.
Market Trust
Continued exposure of price-fixing activities can undermine trust in markets, damaging the credibility and functioning of market economies.
Comparison with Related Terms
-
Market Manipulation: While price fixing targets price levels, market manipulation encompasses a broader range of activities aimed at creating false or misleading appearances in the market.
-
Cartels: These are associations of independent businesses or organizations that collaborate to control production, pricing, and marketing of their products, essentially engaging in horizontal fixing practices.
FAQs
Is price fixing ever legal?
What are the penalties for engaging in price fixing?
How can price fixing be detected?
References
- Motta, M. (2004). Competition Policy: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
- Kovacic, W. E., & Shapiro, C. (2000). Antitrust Policy: A Century of Economic and Legal Thinking. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 43-60.
Summary
Price fixing undermines the principles of free market economics by preventing competition and harming consumers. While many businesses may find such activities tempting in the short term, the legal ramifications and long-term impacts on market trust typically outweigh potential benefits. Understanding the forms, examples, and legal sanctions helps stakeholders navigate and maintain fair competition in marketplaces worldwide.
