Shark Repellent refers to various defensive measures implemented by corporations to deter or fend off hostile takeover attempts. These tactics are designed to make a company less attractive or more difficult to acquire by a potential aggressor. By employing shark repellents, a corporation aims to protect its control, management, and strategic direction from being taken over by another entity.
Types of Shark Repellent
Types and Examples of Shark Repellents
-
Staggered Board of Directors: This measure involves staggering the terms of board members so that only a fraction of the board is up for election each year. This makes it harder for an aggressor to gain control of the board quickly.
-
Golden Parachutes: Executive contracts that include lucrative benefits for executives if they are terminated following a takeover. This increases the cost of acquisition for the bidder.
-
Supermajority Voting Requirements: Requiring a supermajority (higher than simple majority) of shareholder votes to approve key changes, including mergers or acquisitions.
-
Fair Price Amendments: Mandating that any bidder must pay a fair price for the company’s shares, often determined as a premium over the market rate over a specific period of time before the bid.
-
Dual-Class Stock: Issuing different classes of stock with different voting rights, ensuring that founders or current management retain control.
Special Considerations and Historical Context
Special Considerations
Shark repellent strategies, while protecting against hostile takeovers, can sometimes be controversial. They may be seen as entrenching current management and preventing beneficial mergers or acquisitions that could add value to shareholders.
Historical Context
The term “shark repellent” gained popularity during the 1980s and 1990s, a period marked by a surge in hostile takeover activity. During this era, many companies sought to implement various shark repellents to safeguard their autonomy and ensure long-term strategic management.
Applicability in Modern Corporate Governance
Modern Day Use
Shark repellents remain relevant today as corporations continuously face the threat of hostile takeovers. They are part of a broader set of defensive measures that companies leverage to maintain independence and safeguard against aggressive bids.
Comparisons with Other Takeover Defenses
- Poison Pill: Another defensive tactic where existing shareholders are allowed to purchase additional shares at a discount, thus diluting the ownership interest of the potential acquirer.
- Scorched-Earth Defense: A more extreme measure involving significant asset sales or financial restructurings to make the acquisition less attractive or more difficult.
Related Terms
- Takeover: The acquisition of one company by another.
- Hostile Takeover: A takeover attempt that is strongly resisted by the target company’s management.
- Merger: The combination of two or more companies into a single entity, usually to enhance competitive advantage.
- Tender Offer: A public, open offer to purchase a significant portion of a company’s shares at a premium price.
FAQs
What is the main purpose of shark repellent?
Are shark repellent measures legal?
Do shark repellent measures always succeed?
References
- “Corporate Defensive Measures against Hostile Takeovers: An Overview” - Journal of Corporate Finance
- “The Art of M&A Defense: Leading Lawyers and Investment Bankers on Going on the Offensive to Keep Your Company Independent” by Alexandra Reed Lajoux
Shark Repellent tactics are designed to protect a corporation from hostile takeovers by implementing measures that make acquisitions more difficult or less appealing. These strategies include staggered boards, golden parachutes, supermajority voting requirements, fair price amendments, and dual-class stock structures. While they serve to preserve a company’s strategic direction and management, they can also be seen as barriers to potentially beneficial mergers. Understanding and navigating these defensive mechanisms is crucial for executives and investors in corporate governance.
